Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Retro vs Metro Variant: Performance Numbers Compared

Royal Enfield recently launched the Hunter 350 – the most affordable motorcycle based on its J platform. We rode its Metro variant in Bangkok, but what we didn’t get to experience was the base variant, called the Retro. Now, we have tested them together and here’s our take on which one is the better option, purely based on our vbox numbers.

Acceleration

Surprised that the low-spec variant is quicker than the top-end model? Well, that’s because the Retro variant is 3kg lighter than the Metro. While bits like spoked rims and different components sure help the cause, however, the primary reason for the weight saving is the 1.77kg weighing main stand that comes as standard on the Metro. 

The weight difference only gives a marginal push in performance. And when you compare it to its sibling, the Meteor 350, it is a bit slow. In fact, the Hunter 350, despite its sporty appearance, doesn’t feel sporty at all.

Braking

In terms of braking, there’s a huge difference between how the Retro and the Metro variants shed speeds. Also, since the Retro variant comes with a drum brake at the rear and a single-channel ABS unit, the rear tends to lock easily. 

Though the Metro has a shorter stopping distance here, the braking on both the bikes isn’t as impressive. The brakes lack proper feedback and do not have a strong initial bite. That said, the slimmer levers of the Retro variant have a slightly better feel at the lever compared to the Metro variant.

Verdict

(ex-showroom Delhi)

The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Retro is a whole Rs 14,000 cheaper than the Metro Dapper variant. For the extra cash you pay, you get a dual-channel ABS system, alloy wheels with tubeless tyres, and some additional features like a better-equipped console and a different seat. So, even though the Retro has a slight performance advantage here, we’d suggest the Metro variant since it has the safety net of ABS at the rear wheel.