Login or Register for best BikeDekho experience
Login

Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 vs Kawasaki Ninja 300

Should you buy Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 or Kawasaki Ninja 300 Find out which bike is best for you - compare the two models on the basis of their price, mileage, features, colours and other specs. Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 price in Delhi is Rs 303000 (ex-showroom price) whereas the Kawasaki Ninja 300 price in Delhi is Rs 343000 (ex-showroom). The engine in the Interceptor 650 makes 47.4 PS and 52.3 Nm . On the other hand, the power and torque of Ninja 300 stand at 39 PS and 26.1 Nm respectively. Royal Enfield offers the Interceptor 650 in 7 colours whereas the Kawasaki Ninja 300 comes in 3 colours. Out of 80 user reviews, Ninja 300 scores 4.2 whereas the Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 tallies 4.2 out of 5 based on 173 user reviews..TheRoyal Enfield Interceptor 650 Mileage is around 25 kmpl, while the Kawasaki Ninja 300 Mileage is around 30 kmpl.

Interceptor 650 vs Ninja 300

Key HighlightsInterceptor 650Ninja 300
Mileage (Overall)25 kmpl30 kmpl
Max Power47.4 PS @ 7250 rpm39 PS @ 11000 rpm
Body TypeCruiser BikesSports Bikes
Engine TypeInline twin cylinder, 4 stroke / SOHCLiquid-cooled, 4-stroke Parallel Twin
Read More

Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 vs Kawasaki Ninja 300 Comparison

*Ex-showroom price in Delhi

Basic Information

On-Road PriceRs.3.53 Lakh onwards
Rs.3.85 Lakh onwards
Mileage (Overall)25 kmpl
30 kmpl
Max Power47.4 PS @ 7250 rpm
39 PS @ 11000 rpm
User Rating
4.2
Based on 173 Reviews
4.2
Based on 80 Reviews
Body TypeCruiser Bikes
Sports Bikes
EMI Starts₹ 9,668Get EMI offers
Rate of interest @6%* for 3 years
₹ 10,553Get EMI offers
Rate of interest @6%* for 3 years
InsuranceRs.22,593
Interceptor 650 Insurance

Rs.14,458
Ninja 300 Insurance

Colours
Canyon Red
Lime Green
Candy Lime Green
Metallic Moondust Gray
Brochure

Engine and Transmission

Engine Type
Inline twin cylinder, 4 stroke / SOHC
Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke Parallel Twin
Displacement647.95 cc
296 cc
No. of Cylinders
2
2
Cooling System
Air Cooled
Liquid Cooled
Valve Per Cylinder
-
4
Fuel SupplyFuel Injection
Fuel Injection
Clutch
Wet multi plate
Assist & Slipper Clutch
IgnitionDigital spark ignition
Digital
Gear Box
6 Speed
6 Speed, return
Bore
78 mm
62 mm
Stroke
67.8 mm
49 mm
Compression Ratio
9.5:1
10.6:1
Emission Type
bs6-2.0
bs6-2.0
Max Torque
52.3 Nm @ 5150 rpm
26.1 Nm @ 10000 rpm
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only

Features

Instrument Console
-
Analogue and Digital
USB Charging PortYesNo
Speedometer
-
Digital
Techometer-
Analogue
Tripmeter
-
Digital
Odometer
-
Digital
Additional Features Of Variant
Paper element, Forced lubrication, Wet sump with pump driven oil delivery
Heat Management Technology, Caliper Front and Rear - Dual piston, Rake - 27°, Trail - 93 mm, Fuel Type / Minimum Octane Rating - Unleaded petrol/RON91, Hard Alumite Coating Piston, Dual Throttle Valves. Lubrication - Forced lubrication, wet sump
Seat TypeSplit
Split
Clock-
Digital
Stepup Seat-
Yes
Passenger Footrest
YesYes

Features and Safety

Gradeability24 degrees
-
Fuel Gauge-
Digital
Adjustable Windscreen-
Yes
Additional Features
Paper element, Forced lubrication, Wet sump with pump driven oil delivery
Heat Management Technology, Caliper Front and Rear - Dual piston, Rake - 27°, Trail - 93 mm, Fuel Type / Minimum Octane Rating - Unleaded petrol/RON91, Hard Alumite Coating Piston, Dual Throttle Valves. Lubrication - Forced lubrication, wet sump

Mileage and Performance

Overall Mileage25 kmpl
30 kmpl

Dimensions and Capacity

Fuel Capacity13.7 l
17 L
Width
835 mm
715 mm
Length2119 mm
2015 mm
Height1067 mm
1110 mm
Saddle Height
-
780 mm
Ground Clearance174 mm
140 mm
Wheelbase1398 mm
1405 mm
Kerb Weight218 kg
179 kg
Total Weight400 kg
-

Electricals

HeadlightLED
Halogen
Tail LightBulb
LED
Turn Signal LampBulb
LED
LED Tail Lights-
Yes
Low Fuel IndicatorNoYes

Tyres and Brakes

Front Brake Diameter
320 mm
290 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
240 mm
220 mm

Underpinnings

FrameSteel tubular, double cradle frame
Tube diamond, steel

Pros and Cons

  • Pros
  • Cons

    Royal Enfield Interceptor 650

    • Powerful and torquey engine
    • Smooth, refined and free-revving motor
    • Excellent paint quality with good fit and finish
    • Bang on classic, retro looks

    Kawasaki Ninja 300

    • Butter smooth parallel-twin engine
    • Attractive pricing

Competitors of Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 and Kawasaki Ninja 300

Harley Davidson X440
Rs.2.90 - 3.34 Lakh*
TVS Apache RR 310
Rs.3.07 Lakh*
compare with
Kawasaki Ninja 400
Rs.5.92 Lakh*
compare with
*Ex-showroom price in Delhi

User Reviews of Comparison

  • Interceptor 650
  • Ninja 300
  • Best Performance

    This bike delivers an overall excellent experience, excelling in safety and ride quality. It achieves a city mileage of.....Read More

    By nikhil
    On: Apr 26, 2024 | 39 Views
  • Legendary Performance And Classic Design

    For an exhilarating riding experience, the Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 delivers riders like me famed best experience.....Read More

    By bablu
    On: Apr 23, 2024 | 39 Views
  • Powerful and Classic

    The Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 is a classic dirt bike that gives riders the power and purity of riding that comes.....Read More

    By nusrat
    On: Apr 22, 2024 | 27 Views
  • Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 Versatile Cruiser

    The Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 is my top choice for a smooth sailing experience. I love my bike for its explosive.....Read More

    By bilal khan
    On: Apr 18, 2024 | 38 Views
  • It combines classic aesthetics with modern performance

    The Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 is a motorcycle that combines classic cafe racer aesthetics with modern performance.....Read More

    By harshit dagar
    On: Apr 10, 2024 | 77 Views
  • Recommended Bikes

    • Popular Bikes
    • Upcoming Bikes
    • Latest Bikes
    *Ex-showroom price in Delhi

    FAQs on Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 and Kawasaki Ninja 300

    Which bike is better Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 or Kawasaki Ninja 300?

    Which bike among Royal Enfield Interceptor 650 and Kawasaki Ninja 300 is cheaper?