Bajaj Pulsar 150 vs TVS Apache RTR 160 vs Yamaha FZ-S Fi: Specifications Comparison
Here’s how the updated Pulsar stacks up against the other original sporty 150cc bikes
Bajaj recently refreshed the Pulsar 150 with a new face, all-LED lighting, and new colour schemes – giving the iconic nameplate a modern touch. The Bajaj Pulsar 150 continues to be one of India’s most recognisable sporty commuters. We compare the top variant against two of its closest rivals: the TVS Apache RTR 160 2V and Yamaha FZ-S Fi STD. On paper, all three target everyday riders seeking a balance of performance, practicality and style.
Engine|
Specifications |
Bajaj Pulsar 150 |
TVS Apache RTR 160 |
Yamaha FZ-S Fi |
|
Engine |
149.5cc, single-cylinder, air-cooled, 2-valve engine |
159.7cc, single-cylinder, air-cooled, 2-valve engine |
149cc, single-cylinder, air-cooled, 2-valve engine |
|
Power |
14PS @ 8,500rpm |
16.04PS @ 8,750rpm |
12.4PS @ 7,250rpm |
|
Torque |
13.4Nm @ 6,500rpm |
13.85Nm @ 7,000rpm |
13.3Nm @ 5,500rpm |
|
Gearbox |
5-speed |
||
The TVS Apache RTR 160 is clearly the most powerful motorcycle here, thanks largely to its bigger displacement and performance-oriented tuning. The higher peak output suggests stronger top-end performance compared to the other two. That said, outright power isn’t the sole indicator of real-world pace. The Pulsar 150 sits comfortably in the middle, offering a balanced spread of power without chasing outright numbers. The Yamaha FZ-S Fi is the least powerful on paper, but its torque arrives earlier in the rev range, focused on easy rideability and relaxed urban use.
Underpinnings
|
Specifications |
Bajaj Pulsar 150 |
TVS Apache RTR 160 |
Yamaha FZ-S Fi |
|
Frame |
Double cradle |
||
|
Front suspension |
Telescopic fork |
||
|
Rear suspension |
Twin rear gas charged shocks |
7-step adjustable monoshock |
|
|
Front brake |
280mm disc |
270mm disc |
282mm disc |
|
Rear brake |
230mm disc |
240mm disc |
220mm |
|
Front tyre |
90-section |
100-section |
|
|
Rear tyre |
120-section |
140-section |
|
All three bikes use conventional hardware layouts, though their setups differ in intent. The FZ-S Fi stands out with its monoshock, offering more adjustability on paper compared to the other two. The Yamaha also rolls on wider tyres at both ends. While the Bajaj bike and FZ-S have larger front disc brakes, the TVS Apache bike gets dual-channel ABS – making it the safest option here.
Dimensions
|
Specifications |
Bajaj Pulsar 150 |
TVS Apache RTR 160 |
Yamaha FZ-S Fi |
|
Ground clearance |
165mm |
180mm |
165mm |
|
Fuel tank capacity |
15-litres |
12-litres |
13-litres |
|
Seat height |
785mm |
790mm |
|
|
Kerb weight |
150kg |
139kg |
137kg |
Weight plays a crucial role in daily usability and performance, and here the Yamaha FZ-S is the lightest, followed closely by the Apache 160. The Bajaj Pulsar bike is noticeably heavier, which may affect manageability for some riders. Seat heights are fairly similar across the trio, remaining approachable for most riders. The TVS bike’s higher ground clearance stands out, making it better suited to rough urban roads and speed breakers.
Features
|
Feature |
Bajaj Pulsar 150 |
TVS Apache RTR 160 |
Yamaha FZ-S Fi |
|
LCD console |
Yes |
||
|
Bluetooth connectivity |
|||
|
Turn-by-turn navigation |
No |
Yes |
No |
|
Lighting |
All-LED |
LED headlight & tail lamp, halogen indicators |
All-LED |
|
Ride Modes |
No |
3 (Rain, Urban, Sport) |
No |
|
ABS |
Single-channel |
Dual-channel |
Single-channel |
|
Traction control |
No |
Yes |
|
While all three bikes get LCD consoles, the TVS Apache 160 clearly leads here with turn-by-turn navigation, ride modes, dual-channel ABS, and ‘Glide Through Technology’. GTT allows you to ride the bike without any throttle input at low speeds in the first 3 gears. The updated Pulsar 150’s highlights are its new LED headlight and indicators. The Yamaha FZ bike also gets all-LED lighting, and traction control – a feature not offered by anyone else in the 150-160cc space.
Price & Verdict
|
Bajaj Pulsar 150 Twin Disc Upgraded |
TVS Apache RTR 160 Dual Channel ABS |
Yamaha FZ-S Fi STD |
|
Rs 1,15,481 |
Rs 1,23,990 |
Rs 1,23,963 |
(all prices ex-showroom)
The Pulsar 150 offers the most accessible pricing, while the Apache 160 justifies its higher price with more features and safety. The Yamaha bike commands a premium for its perceived brand value and build quality. Based purely on specifications, the Apache appears the most well-rounded, though the comparo warrants a proper road test before choosing a clear favourite – so stay tuned!
User Reviews
For fat tyres, good stability, economic good looking city commuter. Bought in 2020 still using it. Though modified the seat cushion as per usage. Great looking bike since launched till now. I loved the profile at first look. I have the fzs v3 version. It's good overall bike. Bulky body fat tires look great. Seating is average for both pillion and rider. I would put it as a good city commuter. But not made for long rides. If the seats were better it would have been a king. Try the seats and a long drive above 30km first to settle down with this bike. Everything except the seat cushion is great. Yes for city drives definitely recommend for performance safety & mileage. But check seats first. Read More
Needed something dependable for daily city traffic that wouldn't eat up all petrol money. looked at a few other 150cc options but the pulsar 150 just felt like the right balance of price, low maintenance and that classic muscular look that never gets old. Honestly pretty smooth for daily running, engine has nice pickup in lower gears so overtaking in heavy trafffic is easy, getting a solid 45-50 km regularly, only slight downside is minor handle vibes past 85 kmph but for everyday city speeds, its steady and comfortable. Definitely 100 percent recommend it, if you want a reliable everyday bike with decent power and great fuel efficiency, maintenance is super cheap and spare parts are available anywhere. just a solid, no nonsense daily runner that gets the job done. Read More
I have owned this bike since 14th July 2024 and ridden only 6200 km not because it was idle but because I maintained it with utmost care, all service records available. From beginning, I used Motul 7100 10W40 & maintained tyre pressure 29 F & 31 R. This bike deliver me impressive 67Km/L on 5000 RPM on 4th gear I switch to top gear only when need for speed of more than 58KM/H.Read More
Best bike in this segment comfort, mileage, riding experience the acceleration and the best part is naked look of this bike. Great experience Yamaha FZ is a great bike. Since I learned bike riding from this bike it was awesome. So far the ride has been nothing but awesome even long rides are comfortable and fast. No vibration even at high speed great experience. Smooth gear change the sound feels melody, Weather highway or rough road even off riding no problem at all. I would definitely recommend anyone if you want a bike with so many features especially the balance of this bike top notch. I can say all this because I learned bike riding from this FZ so I adore it. As it was a journey to remember.Read More
I chose this bike because I love riding the Apache. I haven't found the same level of comfort in any other bike in this segment and the riding posture is also very comfortable and perfectly balanced and relaxed on every ride. The ride quality of Apache RTR 160 has been very good so far. For long routes, city ride the most important things are comfort and riding posture, and that's what really makes this bike's ride quality better. Everyone has their own choice, but I would definitely choose this bike in this segment. As per current regulations, bikes are subject to scrapper after 15 years, and if this bike is properly maintained, it still run like day one even after 15 years. It's a very durable machine.Read More