TVS Apache RTR 160 4V vs Bajaj Pulsar NS160 vs Hero Xtreme 160R: Specifications Compared
Just how well does the 2021 RTR 160 fare with its direct rivals?
Just how well does the 2021 RTR 160 fare with its direct rivals?
TVS has been constantly updating its products of late, making them better than ever. In this vein, the RTR 160 4V has also received an update for 2021. So, we’re pitting it against two other Indian offerings, the Bajaj Pulsar NS160 and the Hero Xtreme 160R, to see how they fare in a spec comparison:
Engine
|
Specifications |
TVS RTR 160 4V |
Bajaj Pulsar NS160 |
Hero Xtreme 160R |
|
Engine |
159.7cc, single-cylinder, oil-cooled engine |
160.3cc, single-cylinder, oil-cooled engine |
163cc, single-cylinder, air-cooled engine |
|
Power |
17.63PS @ 9250rpm |
17.2PS @9000rpm |
15.2PS @ 8500rpm |
|
Torque |
14.73Nm @ 7250rpm |
14.6Nm @ 7250rpm |
14Nm @ 6500rpm |
|
Gearbox |
5-speed |
5-speed |
5-speed |
For 2021, TVS has tweaked the 159.7cc motor of the RTR 160 such that it makes more power and torque than before. Consequently, it has become the most powerful 160cc motorcycle in the market even though it actually has the smallest cubic capacity. That said, the Hero Xtreme’s peak power and torque come in earlier in the rev range, making it the most practical for city duties. Not to forget, Hero also claims it to be the fastest 160cc motorcycle to reach 60kmph. Meanwhile, the Bajaj Pulsar isn’t too far behind the RTR in terms of performance while its peak power kicks in slightly earlier.
Underpinnings
|
Specifications |
TVS RTR 160 4V |
Bajaj Pulsar NS160 |
Hero Xtreme 160R |
|
Frame |
Double cradle Split Synchro Stiff Frame |
Perimeter Frame |
Diamond Frame |
|
Front suspension |
Telescopic fork |
Telescopic fork |
Telescopic fork |
|
Rear suspension |
Monoshock |
Monoshock |
Monoshock |
|
Front brake |
270mm |
260mm |
276mm |
|
Rear brake |
130mm Drum/ 200mm disc |
230mm |
130mm Drum / 220mm Disc |
|
Front tyre |
90/90-17 |
90/90 -17 |
100/80-17 |
|
Rear tyre |
110/80-17 Drum / 130/70-17 Disc |
120/80 -17 |
130/70-17 |
All three motorcycles are really neck and neck here. The trio feature the same suspension setups comprising a telescopic fork and a monoshock (7-step adjustable for the Hero Xtreme). The story is similar in the braking department as all bikes come in dual-disc variants offering single-channel ABS. The disc sizes are also close but the Xtreme gets the biggest front disc at 276mm while the NS160 gets the biggest rear disc brake at 230mm. As for tyres, the Xtreme has the widest tyres in the lot, which should help it in tackling corners. Speaking of corners, the RTR’s race-derived frame and sticky in-house rubber should make it apt for hitting the ghats once in a while. With the shortest wheelbase and least kerb weight, it’s safe to say that the Hero Xtreme 160R will be the easiest to knife around in tight spaces. Also, at 790mm, it has the lowest saddle height, making it the most suitable for shorter riders. That said, the Pulsar NS160 has the longest wheelbase which should give it good straight line stability. The RTR 160 comes out as a good package thanks to its decent seat height and the highest ground clearance here at 180mm, making it suitable for big bumps.
- 2021 TVS Apache RTR 160 4V vs 2020 Apache RTR 160 4V: What’s different?
- Hero Xtreme 160R 100 Million Edition Launched
- 2021 Bajaj Pulsar 180 Gets Four New Colours
Dimensions
|
Specifications |
TVS RTR 160 4V |
Bajaj Pulsar NS160 |
Hero Xtreme 160R |
|
Wheelbase |
1357mm |
1372mm |
1327mm |
|
Ground clearance |
180mm |
177mm |
167mm |
|
Fuel tank capacity |
12-litres |
12-litres |
12-litres |
|
Seat height |
800mm |
805mm |
790mm |
|
Kerb weight |
149kg (dual-disc) |
151kg |
139.5kg (dual-disc) |
With the shortest wheelbase and least kerb weight, it’s safe to say that the Hero Xtreme 160R will be the easiest to knife around in tight spaces. Also, at 790mm, it has the lowest saddle height, making it the most suitable for shorter riders. That said, the Pulsar NS160 has the longest wheelbase which should give it good straight line stability. The RTR 160 comes out as a good package thanks to its decent seat height and the highest ground clearance here at 180mm, making it suitable for big bumps.
Features
|
TVS RTR 160 4V |
Bajaj Pulsar NS160 |
Hero Xtreme 160R |
|
|
Fully-digital instrument cluster |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
|
LED headlamp |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
|
LED indicators |
No |
No |
Yes |
|
Hazard light switch |
No |
No |
Yes |
|
Glide Through Technology |
Yes |
No |
Yes |
As you can see from the table, the Xtreme 160R is the most feature-packed offering here. It gets full-LED lighting and hazard lights which the other two lack. The RTR 160 isn’t too far back since it just misses out on LED indicators and a hazard light switch but its digital instrument cluster shows much more information than the negative LCD on the Xtreme. The Xtreme 160 and the RTR 160 also feature their traffic assistance tech which lets the rider have a hassle-free ride in bumper-to-bumper traffic. Coming to the NS160, it misses out on all features and doesn’t even get a LED headlamp, which is even seen in much more affordable motorcycles like the TVS Star City Plus.
Price & Verdict
|
TVS RTR 160 4V |
Bajaj Pulsar NS160 |
Hero Xtreme 160R |
|
Rs 1,10,320 |
Rs 1,10,086 |
Rs 1,06,950 |
*All prices ex-showroom Delhi
As far as feature-to-price ratio is concerned, there’s no beating the Hero Xtreme 160R. It undercuts both the TVS and Bajaj offerings by around Rs 3,000 and offers a much more accessible package for the masses. That said, if the performance-to-price ratio is taken, the RTR 160 4V offers excellent value. For Rs 3,000 over the Xtreme 160R, you get better performance with almost the same feature-list. Once again, the NS160 finds itself in the last place as it feels dated and doesn’t stand out in any aspect. If we were to pick, we’d happily take home the TVS RTR 160 4V!
User Reviews
I recently tried hero Xtreme 160r stealth edition for my daily city ride and what stood out immediately was the puncy and low end performance that make stop and go traffic feel effortless, the gear shift are predictible, the bike feel planted and the start and tell feature is surprisingly convenient when you are in rush.Read More
Good handling and medium breaking, medium performance for short time city and highway riding, good sharp stylish looking naked bike, good road presence, low service charge with medium mileage 30 to 40 kmpl. Long ride comfort is not good after 100km. Wrist pain and shoulder pain, good handling bike. It's give you confidence to flicker very easily. Front break is good stopping power but too much abs kicking problem, rear brake is not good, no stopping power. Top speed after 2nd service 124 highest, mileage not that good 40 km after simple riding. If you ride aggressively, mileage can drop upto 30-25 kmpl. Can recommend this bike to the youngsters who go to college and those who want to explore many places on bike. Short time riding and some time aggressive riding and those who want naked sports bike in low cc and low service charge bike, this is good for them.Read More