TVS Apache RTR 160 4V Vs Bajaj Pulsar N160: Which Is The Better Sporty Commuter?
Despite the Pulsar being Rs 10,000 cheaper, we think that the Apache makes more sense!

TVS launched the new top-end ‘TFT’ variant of the Apache RTR 160 4V. It is priced at Rs 1,47,990 and comes with a new instrument console, better features and new paint schemes. The Bajaj Pulsar N160’s top-end ‘USD’ variant is priced at Rs 1,36,992 (both prices ex-showroom, Delhi). We compared these bikes to find out the better one, and here’s what we found out:
Design
The Apache RTR 160 4V’s top-end variant just got a redesigned front end with a projector LED which looks more aggressive now. It gets long tank shrouds that extend forward, giving the bike a muscular look. The graphics on the fuel tank, front headlamp cowl, sleek tail section and underbelly look really attractive and sporty. The Apache RTR 160 4V TFT is available in three colour schemes: Racing Red, Matte Black and Marine Blue. Apart from this, the Apache also gets a limited edition variant, based on the top-spec TFT, that comes with a unique black-gold livery while retaining all the goodies.

The Bajaj Pulsar N160’s top-end variant also gets an aggressive design with a projector headlamp and LED DRLs on either side. It gets grey-white-red graphics on the fuel tank and the tail section. It also comes with a golden-coloured inverted fork that looks beautiful. Also, the alloy wheels get rim stickers of the corresponding colour scheme that are a nice highlight. It is available in four colour schemes: Brooklyn Black, Polar Sky Blue, Pearl Metallic White and Glossy Racing Red. Among these, we think that the Apache has better colour schemes and nicer graphics.
Engine
|
Specifications |
TVS Apache RTR 160 4V TFT |
Bajaj Pulsar N160 USD Variant |
|
Engine |
159.7cc, single-cylinder, oil-cooled engine |
164.82, air-cooled, single-cylinder engine |
|
Power |
17.55PS at 9,250 rpm |
16PS at 8,275rpm |
|
Torque |
14.73Nm at 7,500rpm |
14.65Nm at 6,750rpm |
|
Gearbox |
5-speed |
5-speed |
Both motorcycles offer similar performance, with the TVS Apache RTR 160 4V being slightly more powerful of the two. The Apache also comes with a slip-and-assist clutch which the Bajaj Pulsar N160 misses out on. Considering the Pulsar makes its peak performance at slightly lower revs, it should be the more tractable bike of the two while commuting, though.

Underpinnings
|
Specifications |
TVS Apache RTR 160 4V TFT |
Bajaj Pulsar N160 USD Variant |
|
Frame |
Double-cradle |
Perimeter |
|
Front suspension |
37mm inverted fork |
37mm inverted fork |
|
Rear suspension |
Monoshock |
Gas-charged monoshock |
|
Front brake |
270mm |
300mm |
|
Rear brake |
240mm |
230mm |
|
Front tyre |
90/90-17 |
100/80-R17 Tubeless |
|
Rear tyre |
130/70 R17 |
130/70-R17 Tubeless |
Both bikes have nearly the same set of components on offer. Where the difference will make an impact is the larger front disc brake and chunkier front wheel of the Pulsar. Both of these should help in providing more confidence for younger riders while sport riding.

Dimensions
|
Specifications |
TVS Apache RTR 160 4V TFT |
Bajaj Pulsar N160 USD Variant |
|
Wheelbase |
1357mm |
1348mm |
|
Ground clearance |
180mm |
165mm |
|
Fuel tank capacity |
12-litre |
14-litre |
|
Seat height |
800mm |
795mm |
|
Kerb weight |
146kg |
152kg |
The Apache weighs a lot less than the Pulsar, so it should ideally be more nimble. It also has more ground clearance on offer but neither of them are too low for causing any form of discomfort when tackling those tall speed breakers.
The Bajaj Pulsar N160 gets a larger 14-litre fuel tank, which should give it slightly more range. Also, the Pulsar has a slightly more accessible seat height, which should make it a friendlier machine for shorter riders.
Features
|
Specifications |
TVS Apache RTR 160 4V TFT |
Bajaj Pulsar N160 USD Variant |
|
Traction Control |
Yes |
No |
|
Console |
TFT |
LCD |
|
Connectivity |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Turn-By-Turn Navigation |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Dual-Channel ABS |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Riding Modes |
Yes |
No |
This is where the TVS Apache RTR 160 4V wins; It has a tonne of features like the new 5.2-inch TFT instrument console with smartphone connectivity, turn-by-turn navigation, a USB charging port, and an LED lighting setup. It also has TVS’ GTT (Glide Through Technology) that prevents accidental stalls when at low rpms and keeps the bike in motion even when the clutch is fully released. This tech helps to manoeuvre the bike easily in stop-go traffic. Moreover, a traction control system was added to the bike, making it safer. The Apache also has three riding modes (Urban, Rain and Sport), adjustable clutch and brake levers and switchable rear ABS.

Here, the Bajaj Pulsar N160 falls behind. It bears a simpler LCD instrument console with smartphone connectivity via Bluetooth. It gets an all-LED lighting setup, a USB charging port on the fuel tank and three ABS modes: Road, Rain and ‘Offroad.’ What it ideally misses out on are adjustable levers.
Price And Verdict
|
TVS Apache RTR 160 4V TFT |
Bajaj Pulsar N160 USD Variant |
|
Rs 1,49,990 |
Rs 1,36,992 |
(All prices are ex-showroom, Delhi)
In our opinion, the Apache is the one you should go for if you want funky colours, sporty handling, and a lot of modern features. The Pulsar, on the other hand, looks stylish enough but could do with some flashy colour schemes. It is really difficult to pick the better option of the two as these are perhaps some of the best in not only their class but also their respective companies. It all boils down to which flavour of sportiness you would prefer as they are uniquely distinct and yet deliver equally thrilling riding experiences.
User Reviews
Best bike in this segment..Bike is very smooth in city as well as highways. It has very comfortable seat and posturing with a good mileage and smooth and refined engine. Bike is overall good by looks and performance in the segment of 160cc. I ride the bike 400km in once and it is very smooth and no vibration in handle and refined engine with soothing performance. I only stop bike for half an hour after crossing 250kms and bike is overall perfect for far journey by bike. I would like to recommend this bike to office employees who want a stable bike also mileage, performance, and good engine with a genuine budget and for family bike, it is good. This bike has it own craze in youth who want sporty bike in low budget as it is a fast commuter bike.Read More
1 out of 1 found this helpful