Bajaj Pulsar N160 vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V: Performance Numbers Compared
Is it finally time for the Apache to hand over the crown to the Pulsar? Let’s find out

The TVS Apache RTR 160 4V has been the reigning champion of the 160cc segment. However, now Bajaj has entered the segment, challenging the might of the RTR with the new Pulsar N160. We were impressed with the bike during our first ride, but is it as impressive when pitting against the RTR 160 4V? Here’s our vbox test data to give you an insight:
Acceleration:
|
Bajaj Pulsar N160 |
TVS Apache RTR 160 4V |
|
|
0-60kmph |
5.24s |
5.58s |
|
0-80kmph |
9.44s |
9.84s |
|
0-100kmph |
16.55s |
18.34s |
|
30-70kmph |
6.13s |
6.43s |
|
40-80kmph |
8.14s |
8.71s |
Considering that the Apache RTR 160 4V makes 1.55PS more and is 6kg lighter, it is surprising that the N160 beats it. While the RTR does manage to stay close till 80kmph, post that, the Pulsar just shoots, widening the gap by 1.21 seconds. So, how is the Pulsar managing this?

A big credit goes to the tuning of the Pulsar N160’s engine. It has abundant torque through the rev range and happily goes all the way to the redline which helps it not just ace the 0-100kmph sprint but also the roll-on acceleration tests.
Now, even though the Apache makes power, it isn’t as accessible as the Pulsar, nor does the engine rev as quickly as the Pulsar which costs the bike precious time.

Coming to the tractability, with the Pulsar, you can ride at as low as 20kmph in 5th gear. And while the RTR 160 4V too is friendly in the city, and has the advantage of the Glide Through Traffic (GTT), it is as docile as the Pulsar, and requires you to work the gearbox to make your way through the city.
Braking:
|
Bajaj Pulsar N160 |
TVS Apache RTR 160 4V |
|
|
80-0kmph |
33.91m |
38.36m |
|
60-0kmph |
18.64m |
21.51m |
The Bajaj Pulsar N160 triumphs over the TVS Apache RTR 160 4V in this aspect too. Of course, partly because the Pulsar has a dual-channel ABS system unlike the RTR which features a single-channel ABS unit. Furthermore, the Pulsar has better feedback at the levers than the Apache, which gives you a better control over the braking. That said, the Apache still has the better initial bite among the two bikes.

Fuel Efficiency:
|
Bajaj Pulsar N160 |
TVS Apache RTR 160 4V |
|
|
City |
59.11kmpl |
47.61kmpl |
|
Highway |
44.38kmpl |
49.80kmpl |
Thanks to the tractability, the Bajaj Pulsar N160 has almost 12kmpl more mileage in the city than the Apache RTR 160 4V. However, things change when you leave the urban jungle. The Apache’s performance advantage along with better breathability means that you can hold highway speeds at lower rpm compared to the Pulsar, which results in better mileage on the highway.

Verdict
|
Bajaj Pulsar N160 |
TVS Apache RTR 160 4V |
|
Single-channel: Rs 1,22,854 Dual-channel: Rs 1,27,853 |
Rear drum: Rs 1,21,628 Rear disc: Rs 1,23,735 BT disc: Rs 1,26,451 Special Edition: Rs 1,27,825 |
(both ex-showroom Delhi)
The Bajaj Pulsar N160 clearly takes the win here. It has an engine that not just outperforms the Apache in terms of performance, but is also equally friendly in the city. Furthermore, the Pulsar is also better equipped to shed speeds quickly and safely, thanks to the dual-channel ABS system. So, if you want a bike that’s great for everyday duties and can handle some spirited riding, the N160 is the way to go.
User Reviews
Best bike in this segment..Bike is very smooth in city as well as highways. It has very comfortable seat and posturing with a good mileage and smooth and refined engine. Bike is overall good by looks and performance in the segment of 160cc. I ride the bike 400km in once and it is very smooth and no vibration in handle and refined engine with soothing performance. I only stop bike for half an hour after crossing 250kms and bike is overall perfect for far journey by bike. I would like to recommend this bike to office employees who want a stable bike also mileage, performance, and good engine with a genuine budget and for family bike, it is good. This bike has it own craze in youth who want sporty bike in low budget as it is a fast commuter bike.Read More
6 out of 6 found this helpful