Hero Xoom 160 vs TVS Ntorq 150: Detailed Comparison

The Hero Xoom 160 and TVS Ntorq 150 are two of the latest entrants in the sub-160cc segment. Despite targeting a similar audience, the two scooters differ significantly in terms of pricing, dimensions, equipment and performance. Here's a detailed comparison between the Hero Xoom 160 and the TVS Ntorq 150 to see how they stack up on paper.

Price & Variants

• The Hero Xoom 160 is offered in a single  variant priced at ?1,43,498 (ex-showroom). In comparison, the TVS Ntorq 150 is available in two variants, giving buyers greater flexibility while making a buying decision.

• The Base variant of the TVS Ntorq 150 is priced at ?1,11,350, while the more feature-rich TFT variant costs ?1,20,350 (both ex-showroom). Even the top-spec Ntorq undercuts the Hero Xoom 160 by ?23,148, making it the more affordable scooter in this comparison.

Dimensions & Design

• The Hero Xoom 160 has a 63mm longer wheelbase, favouring stability during highway riding.

• Both scooters offer 155mm ground clearance, making them equally capable of handling typical Indian road conditions.

• The Hero Xoom 160's 7-litre fuel tank is 1.2 litres larger than the 5.8-litre unit on the TVS Ntorq 150.

• A larger fuel tank gives the Hero Xoom 160 an advantage for longer rides between refuelling stops.

• The TVS Ntorq 150's 770mm seat height is 17mm lower than the Hero Xoom 160's, making it easier for shorter riders to handle the scooter.

• At 115kg, the TVS Ntorq 150 is 27kg lighter than the Hero Xoom 160.

• The significantly lower kerb weight should make the TVS Ntorq 150 feel more agile in city traffic and while parking the scooter.

• The Hero Xoom 160 is better suited to riders looking for a larger, more planted scooter with enhanced touring credentials.

• The TVS Ntorq 150 is likely to appeal to buyers seeking a lightweight, sporty scooter that's easy to ride in urban environments.

• The Hero Xoom 160 has a rugged adventure-scooter appearance with a tall windscreen, upright ergonomics and muscular bodywork.

• In contrast, the TVS Ntorq 150 maintains the aggressive, compact styling that has become synonymous with the Ntorq name.

Underpinnings

• The Hero Xoom 160 has twin rear shock absorbers, whereas the TVS Ntorq 150 employs a single rear shock absorber. A monoshock-style layout generally offers better chassis control, while Hero's twin-shock setup is designed to deliver a more comfortable riding experience.

• Both scooters are equipped with a front disc brake assisted by single-channel ABS, improving braking confidence by helping prevent front-wheel lock-up during emergency stops.

• The rear braking setup is identical, with both models using a drum brake.

• The Hero Xoom 160 rides on larger 14-inch wheels, wrapped in 120/70 front and 140/60 rear tyres.

• The TVS Ntorq 150 uses smaller 12-inch wheels, paired with 100/80 front and 110/80 rear tyres.

• The Hero's wider tyres are likely to provide a larger contact patch, which can lead to better straight-line stability and grip.

• The Ntorq's smaller wheels should contribute to quicker steering responses and easier manoeuvrability in congested city traffic.

Features

• Both scooters support Bluetooth connectivity for turn-by-turn navigation, allowing riders to access connected features through their smartphones.

• Each model comes equipped with a USB charging port, enabling convenient charging of mobile devices while on the move.

• The TVS Ntorq 150 features full-LED lighting, giving it an advantage in terms of illumination and premium appeal.

• The Hero Xoom 160 does not offer full-LED lighting, making this one area where the TVS has a clear edge.

• The Hero Xoom 160 uses an LCD instrument console, while the TVS Ntorq 150 gets a TFT display, offering sharper graphics and a more modern user interface. The Ntorq 150’s TFT console also supports day and night display modes, Alexa voice assist, smartwatch compatibility, and more.

• The Ntorq 150 also offers two riding modes: Street and Race.

• Both scooters provide 22 litres of underseat storage, making them equally practical for carrying daily essentials.

• The TVS Ntorq 150 has an additional 2-litre glove box in the front apron, increasing overall storage convenience for smaller items such as a wallet, phone or documents.

• The TVS Ntorq 150 is the clear winner in this segment with the TFT console, riding modes and the bigger overall storage space.

Performance

• The Hero Xoom 160 is powered by a 156cc liquid-cooled, single-cylinder engine, while the TVS Ntorq 150 has a 149.7cc air-cooled, single-cylinder engine.

• The Hero Xoom 160 produces 14.6PS, outperforming the 13.2PS generated by the TVS Ntorq 150.

• The TVS Ntorq 150 develops 14.2Nm of torque, marginally exceeding the 14Nm produced by the Hero Xoom 160.

• The TVS also reaches its peak torque at 5,500rpm, earlier than that of the Xoom 160, which could provide a stronger initial response during city riding.

• The Xoom 160's liquid-cooled engine is expected to maintain more consistent performance during prolonged riding and in demanding conditions.

• Overall, the Hero Xoom 160 leads in outright power, while the TVS Ntorq 150 counters with marginally higher torque and earlier torque delivery.

Verdict

The Hero Xoom 160 stands out with its rugged maxi-scooter design, 156cc liquid-cooled engine, larger dimensions, 7-litre fuel tank and wider 14-inch tyres. These attributes make it well suited for riders who spend considerable time on highways or prefer a scooter with a commanding road presence and long-distance capability.

The TVS Ntorq 150, meanwhile, offers a compelling package for urban riders. It is significantly lighter, available in multiple variants, equipped with a TFT instrument console, full-LED lighting and an additional 2-litre front glove box. Combined with its lower asking price, the Ntorq delivers a strong value proposition without compromising on performance.