Bajaj Avenger Street 220 vs Royal Enfield Bullet 350: Price, Dimensions, Design, Underpinnings, Features, And Powertrains Comparison
Cruiser comfort meets old-school roadster: which of these two everyday motorcycles makes more sense?

The Bajaj Avenger Street 220 is a classic cruiser designed for relaxed riding, low seat height comfort, and ease of use in daily conditions. The Bullet 350, on the other hand, offers a more upright riding experience with a strong emphasis on torque and road presence.
Despite sharing similar use cases such as commuting and occasional touring, the two motorcycles differ significantly in terms of dimensions, hardware, and engine characteristics. Let’s break down how these two motorcycles compare across all key aspects:
Price & Variants


|
Bajaj Avenger Street 220 |
Royal Enfield Bullet 350 |
||
|
Colours |
Ex-showroom Price |
Colours |
Ex-showroom Price |
|
Ebony Black |
Rs 1,30,172 |
Military Black |
Rs 1,64,423 |
|
Cocktail Wine Red |
Battalion Black |
Rs 1,66,650 |
|
|
Standard Black |
Rs 1,90,312 |
||
|
Standard Maroon |
|||
|
Black Gold |
Rs 2,08,012 |
||
- The Bajaj Avenger Street 220 is significantly more affordable, starting at Rs 1.30 lakh (ex-showroom).
-
The Royal Enfield Bullet 350 starts at Rs 1.64 lakh and goes up to over Rs 2.08 lakh, depending on the variant. This creates a price gap of nearly Rs 80,000 with the Avenger Street 220’s pricing.
-
The Avenger’s single variant makes it easier for buyers to choose, while the Bullet offers multiple trims with varying levels of finish and detailing.
Dimensions & Design


|
Specifications |
Bajaj Avenger Street 220 |
Royal Enfield Bullet 350 |
Difference |
|
Wheelbase |
1,490 mm |
1,390 mm |
- 100 mm |
|
Ground clearance |
169 mm |
170 mm |
+ 1 mm |
|
Fuel tank capacity |
13 litres |
13 litres |
- |
|
Seat height |
737 mm |
805 mm |
+ 68 mm |
|
Kerb weight |
160 kg |
195 kg |
+ 35 kg |
- The Avenger Street 220’s long wheelbase and low stance define its cruiser identity. It offers excellent straight-line stability and a planted feel on highways.
-
The Bullet 350, with a shorter wheelbase, feels more upright and balanced, making it easier to manoeuvre in tighter spaces.
-
The Avenger’s extremely low seat height of 737 mm makes it one of the most accessible motorcycles to ride, especially for shorter riders.
-
The Bullet’s 805 mm seat height, while still manageable, feels noticeably taller and more commanding.
-
The Bullet is significantly heavier, making it more demanding to handle at low speeds.
-
Both bikes offer identical fuel tank capacities, ensuring similar range potential.
-
The Avenger Street 220 follows a laid-back cruiser design with stretched proportions, forward-set footpegs, and a relaxed riding posture.
-
The Bullet 350 stays true to its heritage with a timeless design featuring a teardrop tank, upright stance, and minimalistic styling.
-
The Avenger is built for comfort and ease, while the Bullet focuses on tradition and visual presence.
Underpinnings


|
Specifications |
Bajaj Avenger Street 220 |
Royal Enfield Bullet 350 |
|
Front suspension |
Telescopic fork |
41 mm telescopic fork |
|
Rear suspension |
Twin shock absorbers |
Twin shock absorbers |
|
Front brake |
280 mm disc brake |
300 mm disc brake |
|
Rear brake |
130 mm drum brake with single-channel ABS |
270 mm disc brake with dual-channel ABS |
|
Front tyre |
90/90-17 |
100/90 - 19 |
|
Rear tyre |
130/90 - 15 |
120/80 - 18 |
- The Bullet 350 has a significantly better braking setup, with a larger front disc and a rear disc brake with dual-channel ABS available as standard.
-
The Avenger Street 220 has a rear drum brake with only single-channel ABS, which is less effective in comparison.
-
The Bullet’s larger front wheel improves stability, especially on uneven roads.
-
The Avenger’s smaller wheels and softer setup are tuned for comfort rather than performance.
-
Overall, the Bullet 350 offers better braking confidence and handling capabilities.
Features
|
Specifications |
Bajaj Avenger Street 220 |
Royal Enfield Bullet 350 |
|
Full-LED lighting |
No |
No |
|
Bluetooth connectivity |
Yes |
Yes (as an accessory) |
|
USB charging |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Instrument Console |
Semi-digital |
Semi-digital |
- The Bullet 350 comes equipped with smartphone pairing that enables call/SMS notifications and turn-by-turn navigation via the optional Tripper pod. The Avenger Street 220, in contrast, does not support Bluetooth connectivity in any form.
-
A USB charging port is offered on the Hunter 350 for added convenience, whereas the Avenger Street 220 does not have this feature.
-
The Avenger Street 220 has a simple LCD console, while the Hunter 350 features a semi-digital setup with an analogue speedometer and a digital screen for information such as fuel level, gear position, odometer, and trip details.
-
Overall, the Hunter 350 has a clear advantage in this department thanks to its connectivity features and added practicality.
Performance


|
Specifications |
Bajaj Avenger Street 220 |
Royal Enfield Bullet 350 |
|
Engine |
220cc, single-cylinder, oil-cooled engine |
349cc, single-cylinder, air-oil-cooled engine |
|
Power |
19.03 PS at 8,500rpm |
20.2 PS at 6,100rpm |
|
Torque |
17.55 Nm at 5,650rpm |
27 Nm at 4,000rpm |
|
Gearbox |
5-speed |
5-speed |
The Bullet 350 produces significantly more torque, producing more pulling power at the lower rpm levels.
-
This makes the Bullet easier to ride in city conditions and better suited for carrying loads or riding with a pillion.
-
The Avenger produces slightly less power and torque, but its lighter weight helps maintain decent acceleration.
-
The Bullet’s engine feels more relaxed and torquey, while the Avenger’s engine is smoother and more rev-friendly.
-
Both motorcycles use 5-speed gearboxes, but the Bullet’s engine characteristics make it more versatile overall.
BikeDekho Says

The Avenger Street 220 is built for comfort, ease of use, and affordability. Its low seat height, relaxed ergonomics, and lightweight nature make it ideal for beginners and riders who prioritise comfort above all else.

The Bullet 350, on the other hand, offers a more premium experience with stronger performance, better hardware, and unmatched heritage appeal. It feels more substantial and capable, especially for longer rides and varied road conditions.
If your priority is a budget-friendly, easy-to-ride cruiser for daily use, the Avenger Street 220 is the better choice. If you are looking for a more powerful, versatile, and iconic motorcycle with better hardware and road presence, the Bullet 350 stands out as the superior option.
Other Rivals:

The Bajaj Avenger Street 220 is the more affordable bike, but the Hunter 350 feels more premium and engaging to ride.

The Bajaj Avenger Street 220 offers laid-back cruiser ergonomics, but the TVS Ronin offers better handling capabilities.
User Reviews
Thankyou ROYAL ENFIELD 🖤Very nice motercycle. My first choice is Royal enfield hunter 350. I like it's features, it's stylish look, it's exaust sound and many more about it. This is a master piece. Looking classy and elegant. Thank you ROYAL ENFIELD for this motorcycle, I am very happy to have a HUNTER 350. I love this bike.Read More
I’ve been using the BajajI’ve been using the Bajaj Avenger Street 220 (STD) for a while now, and I’d like to share my honest opinion based on my riding experience.The first thing that caught my attention is its stylish street cruiser look. The low-slung design, matte black finish, and wide handlebars really give it a powerful road presence. It feels like a big bike but comes at a price that’s still affordable. In terms of comfort, it’s honestly one of the most relaxing bikes I’ve ridden. The riding posture is laid-back, and the seat is broad, making long rides smooth and enjoyable. It doesn’t strain your back even on longer routes.The 220cc engine delivers a smooth and punchy performance. Whether I’m cruising in the city or hitting the highway, the power is enough for my needs. It pulls well even with a pillion and has a good pickup.Read More