• English
    • Login / Register

    Suzuki Gixxer SF (2015-2018) vs Bajaj Pulsar NS160

    Should you buy Suzuki Gixxer SF (2015-2018) or Bajaj Pulsar NS160 Find out which bike is best for you - compare the two models on the basis of their price, mileage, features, colours and other specs. Suzuki Gixxer SF (2015-2018) price in is Rs 93,499 (ex-showroom price) whereas the Bajaj Pulsar NS160 price in is Rs 1,23,694 (ex-showroom). The engine in the Gixxer SF (2015-2018) makes 14.8 PS and 14 Nm . On the other hand, the power and torque of Pulsar NS160 stand at 17 PS and 14.6 Nm respectively. Suzuki offers the Gixxer SF (2015-2018) in 5 colours whereas the Bajaj Pulsar NS160 comes in 4 colours. Out of 345 user reviews, Pulsar NS160 scores 4.3 whereas the Suzuki Gixxer SF (2015-2018) tallies 3.8 out of 5 based on 24 user reviews..The Suzuki Gixxer SF (2015-2018) Mileage is around 51 kmpl, while the Bajaj Pulsar NS160 Mileage is around 40.36 kmpl.

    Gixxer SF (2015-2018) vs Pulsar NS160

    Key HighlightsGixxer SF (2015-2018)Pulsar NS160
    Mileage (ARAI)51 kmpl40.36 kmpl
    Max Power14.8 PS @ 8000 rpm17 PS @ 9000 rpm
    Body TypeSports BikesSports Bikes
    Engine TypeSingle Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 2 Valve, SOHCOil Cooled, Twin Spark, 4-Value FI Engine
    Read More

    Suzuki Gixxer SF (2015-2018) vs Bajaj Pulsar NS160 Comparison

    Basic Information
    On-Road Price
    Rs.1,11,062* Onwards
    Rs.1,44,359* Onwards
    Mileage (ARAI)
    51 kmpl
    40.36 kmpl
    Max Power
    14.8 PS @ 8000 rpm
    17 PS @ 9000 rpm
    User Rating
    3.8
    Based on Suzuki Gixxer SF (2015-2018) Reviews
    4.3
    Based on Bajaj Pulsar NS160 Reviews
    Body Type
    Sports Bikes
    EMI Starts₹ 4,188
    Get EMI offers
    Rate of interest @9.7%* for 3 years
    Engine and Transmission
    Engine Type
    space Image
    Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 2 Valve, SOHC
    Oil Cooled, Twin Spark, 4-Value FI Engine
    Displacement
    154.9 cc
    160.3 cc
    Number Of Cylinders
    space Image
    1
    1
    Cooling System
    space Image
    Air Cooled
    Oil Cooled
    Valves (per cylinder)
    space Image
    2
    4
    Supply System
    Fuel Injection
    Fuel Injection
    Clutch
    space Image
    -
    Wet Multiplate
    Gearbox
    space Image
    5 Speed
    6 Speed
    Bore
    space Image
    56 mm
    58 mm
    Stroke
    space Image
    62.9 mm
    60.7 mm
    Compression Ratio
    space Image
    -
    9.8 : 1
    Emission Norm Compliance
    space Image
    -
    bs6.2
    Max Torque
    space Image
    14 Nm @ 6000 rpm
    14.6 Nm @ 7250 rpm
    Starting System
    space Image
    Self Start Only
    Self Start Only
    Features
    USB Charging Port
    -
    Yes
    Instrument Console Type
    space Image
    Digital
    Digital
    Bluetooth ConnectivityNo
    Bluetooth
    Navigation
    -
    Yes
    Call/SMS Alerts
    -
    Yes
    Speedometer
    space Image
    Digital
    Digital
    Tachometer
    Digital
    Digital
    Tripmeter
    space Image
    Digital
    Digital
    Odometer
    space Image
    Digital
    Digital
    Seat Type
    Single
    Split
    Handlebar type
    Single Piece
    -
    Body Graphics
    space Image
    YesYes
    ClockYesYes
    Passenger BackrestNo
    -
    Stepup SeatYes
    -
    Rear Footpegs
    space Image
    YesYes
    Carry hookNo
    -
    Underseat storageNo
    -
    Average Fuel Economy Indicator
    -
    Yes
    Distance To Empty
    -
    Yes
    Features and Safety
    Service Due Indicator
    -
    Yes
    Fuel Gauge
    Digital
    Digital
    Riding Modes
    -
    Yes
    Carry HookNo
    -
    Real Time Mileage Indicator
    -
    Yes
    Performance
    City Mileage (Tested)
    51 kmpl
    -
    Highway Mileage (Tested)
    62.47 kmpl
    -
    Overall Mileage
    -
    40.36 kmpl
    ARAI Mileage
    51 kmpl
    -
    Acceleration 0-100 kmph (sec)
    17.56 Sec
    -
    Braking 60-0 km/h
    2.43s, 17.20m Sec
    -
    Braking 80-0 km/h
    3.40s, 34.82m Sec
    -
    Claimed Top Speed
    127 kmph
    120 kmph
    Dimensions and Capacity
    Fuel Tank Capacity
    12 L
    12 L
    Width
    space Image
    785 mm
    804 mm
    Length
    2050 mm
    2017 mm
    Height
    1085 mm
    1060 mm
    Fuel Tank Reserve Capacity
    -
    2.4 L
    Ground Clearance
    160 mm
    170 mm
    Wheelbase
    1330 mm
    1372 mm
    Kerb Weight
    139 kg
    152 kg
    Seat height
    780 mm
    805 mm
    Electricals
    Headlight
    Halogen
    LED
    Taillight
    LED
    LED
    Indicators
    Bulb
    LED
    Daytime Running Lamps
    -
    Yes
    Low Fuel IndicatorYesYes
    Distance To Empty
    -
    Yes
    Average Fuel Economy Indicator
    -
    Yes
    Pilot LampsNo
    -
    Tyres and Brakes
    Front Brake Size
    space Image
    -
    300 mm
    Rear Brake Size
    space Image
    -
    230 mm
    Front Tyre Pressure (Rider)
    29 psi
    25 psi
    Front Tyre Pressure (Rider & Pillion)
    29 psi
    25 psi
    Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider)
    33 psi
    28 psi
    Rear Tyre Pressure (Rider & Pillion)
    33 psi
    32 psi
    Underpinnings
    Frame
    -
    Perimeter

    Pros & Cons

    • Pros
    • Cons
    • Suzuki Gixxer SF (2015-2018)

      • Fully-faired look
      • Efficient and reliable power mill
      • Presence of ABS

      Bajaj Pulsar NS160

      • Handles well and changes direction quickly
      • Now comes with smartphone connectivity and turn-by-turn navigation
      • Styling is similar to its bigger sibling, the NS200
    • Suzuki Gixxer SF (2015-2018)

      • Lack of clip-on handlebar

      Bajaj Pulsar NS160

      • One of the heaviest bikes in its class
      • Engine isn’t refined at higher revs
      • Pulsar N160 does almost everything that the NS160 does, at a much lower price

    Gixxer SF (2015-2018) comparison with similar bikes

    Pulsar NS160 comparison with similar bikes

    Research more on Gixxer SF (2015-2018) and Pulsar NS160

    • Recent News
    • Videos

    User Reviews of Comparison

    • Gixxer SF (2015-2018)
    • Pulsar NS160
    • R
      ravi on Oct 09, 2025
      3.5
      Gixer sf 155cc bike review
      Performance is good and mileage average 45kmpl and less driven and disc brakes are very accurate and it has digital display and no Major issue faced until Today and servicing bike time to time and minor scratches present on bike and new front tire fitter recent. Long ride also it performs well and bike power is good as well
      Read More
      1
    • S
      santhosh on Sep 20, 2024
      5.0
      Suzuki love
      Worth buying I feel comfortable for driving this nd mileage too good nd traveling long is more comfortable nd use for me... bike wright also lightly good than other bikes
    • P
      patel on Feb 18, 2024
      4.0
      Value For Money Bike
      Riding Gixxer since 2018, It gives mileage between 45-50 in mixed road conditions. Comfort level is average, not good for long riding especially for pillion. The performance is nice. You can ride it at speeds aalso complete in the range of 1,000 to 2,000. A headlightbove 90 km/h confidently because it provides a good braking system. General service is also complete in the range of 1,000 to 2,000. A headlight throw from a halogen bulb is average.
      Read More
      1
    • N
      nawal on May 23, 2022
      4.3
      Best Bike In This Price Segment
      It is the best bike in this price segment. The best style, best performance, and low maintenance costs are the reasons why I love this bike.
    • A
      anonymous on Nov 11, 2019
      4.7
      Good Looking Bike - Suzuki Gixxer SF
      It is a good looking bike. I was searching for a sports bike with good mileage and comfortable specs. I love long rides and I personally experienced that there is a very nice bike.
      Read More
      2
    • Suzuki Gixxer SF (2015-2018) Reviews
    • U
      unnay on Jul 03, 2026
      3.7
      Good bike for youngsters
      Good handling and medium breaking, medium performance for short time city and highway riding, good sharp stylish looking naked bike, good road presence, low service charge with medium mileage 30 to 40 kmpl. Long ride comfort is not good after 100km. Wrist pain and shoulder pain, good handling bike. It's give you confidence to flicker very easily. Front break is good stopping power but too much abs kicking problem, rear brake is not good, no stopping power. Top speed after 2nd service 124 highest, mileage not that good 40 km after simple riding. If you ride aggressively, mileage can drop upto 30-25 kmpl. Can recommend this bike to the youngsters who go to college and those who want to explore many places on bike. Short time riding and some time aggressive riding and those who want naked sports bike in low cc and low service charge bike, this is good for them.
      Read More
      6
    • R
      rizwan on Jun 30, 2026
      4.3
      Excellent bike
      My pulsar NS 160 is still in excellent condition with all documents and riding experience is awesome and bike is also fast and reliable. It also offers dual channel Abs and it has less maintenance cost and it gives immense pleasure to ride. Bike mileage is about 40 kmpl and full tank costs nearly 1k only and this is the best bike, I have ever rode in my life.
      Read More
      1
    • G
      gaddigesha on Jun 21, 2026
      5.0
      Good condition and safety also , mileage also good
      It's good bike, whenever I bought that time onwards it's good, comfortable, smooth to ride, we can take long ride also, good mileage bike, maintenance friendly, it's a white and black combination bike and also pickup also good, its take early to pick up compared others bike totally it's a good bike.
      Read More
      1
    • D
      dhiman on Jan 06, 2026
      3.8
      good bike but need some improvements.
      The bike is good handling and performance but the mileage is not that good, it gives me 30-35 kmpl mileage. Meanwhile, the other 160 segment bikes give more mileage and it's not that smooth at higher revs, feels too much vibration. Design is good and handling is good but not so comfortable feels pain in back and shoulder after long ride as it's sports bike.
      Read More
      4 5
    • P
      premyanshu on Dec 16, 2025
      3.7
      Review of my 6 years old NS160
      I got this bike when i was 18 back in 2019, after almost 6 plus years and 30 thousand kilometres. I personally see this bike as the best value for money one can get. Apart from that this bike is still relevant after all these years. The one thing i like the most about this vehicle is its handling. If maintained well this bike gives a smooth and comfortable ride be it in city or highway. Mine is twin disc variant with single channel ABS, break bite is quick enough to react in emergency breaking situations. The only con I have noticed so far is bajaj's parts durability. Though they offer parts at cheaper rates comparatively but still it becomes a headache when you need to replace them more often. Will recommend this bike any day. For me this is a perfect package of commuter, adventure, long riding basically everything. I have done 500 kms in a single day stopped at every 100 kms for nearly 30 mins and the bike performed very well. This is a perfect bike for those who look for a all-rounder bike with low maintenance.
      Read More
      7 2
    • Bajaj Pulsar NS160 Reviews

    Popular Comparisons

    • Bikes
    • Scooters
    Scooters Comparisons

    FAQs on Suzuki Gixxer SF (2015-2018) and Bajaj Pulsar NS160

    Q) Which bike is better Suzuki Gixxer SF (2015-2018) or Bajaj Pulsar NS160?

    A) As per our average user rating, Suzuki Gixxer SF (2015-2018) has a score of 3.8/5 while Bajaj Pulsar NS160 has rate of 4.3 /5.

    Q) Which bike among Suzuki Gixxer SF (2015-2018) and Bajaj Pulsar NS160 is cheaper?

    A) Suzuki Gixxer SF (2015-2018) price starts at Rs 86,782 & Bajaj Pulsar NS160 price starts at Rs 1,23,694 in Delhi . Suzuki Gixxer SF (2015-2018) is cheaper between these.
    *Ex-showroom price in Delhi
    ×
    We need your city to customize your experience