Suzuki Burgman Street vs TVS NTORQ 125 Comparison
- rs69,208*VS
- rs58,552*
Suzuki Burgman Street vs TVS NTORQ 125
Suzuki Burgman Street vs TVS NTORQ 125: Suzuki Burgman Street STD is the more fuel efficient one with a claimed mileage of 53.5 kmpl while the claimed figure for TVS NTORQ 125 Drum is 47 kmpl. TVS NTORQ 125 is priced at Rs 58552 (Ex-showroom Price) while Suzuki Burgman Street is the costlier one priced at Rs 69208 (Ex-showroom Price). Burgman Street is available in 3 colour options while NTORQ 125 has 7 colours to choose from.
| Overview | ||
|---|---|---|
| On Road Price | Rs.80,654 onwards | Rs.66,577 onwards |
| Mileage (ARAI) | 53.5 kmpl | 47 kmpl |
| Engine Type | Air Cooled, Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 2-Valve, SOHC | Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, OHC |
| Displacement | 124 cc | 124.79 cc |
| No. of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Max Power | 8.7 PS @ 7000 rpm | 9.4 PS @ 7500 rpm |
| User Rating | ||
Photo Comparison | ||
Engine |
| |
| Front Brake | Disc | Drum |
| Rear Brake | Drum | Drum |
| Colours | BlackGreyWhite | - |
| Fuel Capacity | 5.6 L | 5 L |
| EMI Starts | ₹ 2,334 | ₹ 1,914 |
| Engine and Transmission | ||
|---|---|---|
| Engine Type | Air Cooled, Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, 2-Valve, SOHC | Single Cylinder, 4-Stroke, OHC |
| Displacement | 124 cc | 124.79 cc |
| Max Power | 8.7 PS @ 7000 rpm | 9.4 PS @ 7500 rpm |
| Max Torque | 10.2 Nm @5000 rpm | 10.5 Nm @ 5500 rpm |
| No. of Cylinders | 1 | 1 |
| Cooling System | Air Cooled | Air Cooled |
| Valve Per Cylinder | 2 | 3 |
| Drive Type | Belt Drive | Belt Drive |
| Starting | Kick and Self Start | Kick and Self Start |
| Fuel Supply | Carburetor | Carburetor |
| Transmission | Automatic | Automatic |
| Gear Box | CVT | CVT |
| Bore | 52.5 mm | NA |
| Stroke | 57.4 mm | NA |
| Features and Safety | ||
|---|---|---|
| ABS | No | No |
| Braking Type | NA | Synchronized Braking System |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
| Odometer | Digital | Digital |
| Tripmeter | Digital | Digital |
| Fuel Gauge | Digital | Digital |
| Console | Digital | Digital |
| Clock | Yes | Yes |
| Engine Immobilizer | No | No |
| Anti Theft Alarm | No | No |
| Adjustable Windscreen | Yes | NA |
| Additional Features | NA | Multi-Mode Display-Street, Sport, Ride Stats, Incoming Call/Message/Missed Call Alerts, Navigation Assist, Last Parked Location Assist, Auto Reply SMS, Rider App |
| Carry Hook | NA | Yes |
| Passenger Footrest | Yes | Yes |
| Mileage and Performance | ||
|---|---|---|
| ARAI Mileage | 53.5 kmpl | NA |
| City Mileage | 54.9 kmpl | 47 kmpl |
| Highway Mileage | 54.7 kmpl | 53.4 kmpl |
| Max Speed | 92.89 kmph | 95 kmph |
| 0-60 Kmph | 8.69 Sec | 9 Sec |
| 0-100 Kmph | 16.78 Sec | NA |
| Quarter Mile | 23.02s@88.01 kmph Sec | NA |
| Kickdown (20-80 kmph) | 4.65 Sec | NA |
| Braking (60-0 Kmph) | 21.56 Sec | NA |
| Chassis and Suspension | ||
|---|---|---|
| Chassis | NA | High Rigidity Under Bone Rectangular Tube Type |
| Front Suspension | Telescopic | Telescopic Suspension |
| Rear Suspension | Hydraulic Type | Gas filled Hydraulic Type Coil Spring Shock Absorber |
| Body Graphics | NA | Yes |
| Dimensions and Capacity | ||
|---|---|---|
| Length | 1880 mm | 1865 mm |
| Width | 675 mm | 710 mm |
| Height | 1140 mm | 1160 mm |
| Fuel Capacity | 5.6 L | 5 L |
| Saddle Height | 780 mm | NA |
| Ground Clearance | 160 mm | 155 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1265 mm | 1285 mm |
| Kerb Weight | 108 kg | 116.1 kg |
| Underseat storage | 21.5 L | 22 L |
| Electricals | ||
|---|---|---|
| Headlight | LED | Halogen |
| Tail Light | LED | LED |
| Turn Signal Lamp | LED | LED |
| DRLs | NA | Yes |
| LED Tail Lights | Yes | Yes |
| Battery Type | MF | MF |
| Battery Capacity | 12 V, 3 Ah | 12 V - 4 Ah |
| Tyres and Brakes | ||
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Size | Front :-90/90-12, Rear :- 90/100-10 | Front :-100/80-12, Rear :- 110/80-12 |
| Tyre Type | Tubeless | Tubeless |
| Wheel Size | Front :-12 inch, Rear :-10 inch | Front :-12 inch, Rear :-12 inch |
| Wheels Type | Cast | Alloy |
| Front Brake | Disc | Drum |
| Rear Brake | Drum | Drum |
| Rear Brake Diameter | NA | 130 mm |
Recommended articles for Scooter buyers
The Burgman is big practical good looking and very comfortable But is it better than our favourite cc scooter the...
How does Suzuki s premium cc offering stack up against Honda s flagship scooter on paper With competition in the...
The Suzuki Burgman Street steps up the style quotient with its maxi-scooter looks but is the same as the Access...
TVS first cc scooter brings many segment-firsts to the table This is the year of cc scooters going by the...
What works for the cc TVS offering and what doesn rsquo t We take a look With the ever-increasing competition...
Research more on Burgman Street and NTORQ 125
- Recent News
- Videos
Competitors of Suzuki Burgman Street
- Rs.64,356 - 66,783*
- Rs.62,541 - 64,684*
- Rs.71,693 - 76,479*
- Rs.63,845 - 72,483*
- Rs.60,308 - 67,790*
Competitors of TVS NTORQ 125
- Rs.72,102 - 76,874*
- Rs.77,001 - 85,731*
- Rs.63,845 - 72,483*
- Rs.1.07 - 1.09 Lakh*
- Rs.58,740 - 63,664*
Recommended Scooters
- Popular Scooters
- Upcoming Scooters
- Latest Scooters
- Honda Activa 5GRs54,911 - 57,176*
- Honda DioRs53,218 - 55,218*
- Honda Activa 125Rs60,628 - 65,012*
- Suzuki Access 125Rs55,977 - 61,788*
- TVS JupiterRs52,645 - 59,695*
- Li-ions Spock Electric ScooterRs65,000*
- 22Kymco X-Town 300iRs1.85 Lakh*
- 22Kymco iFlowRs90,000*
- 22Kymco Like200Rs1.12 Lakh*
- Avera RetrosaRs1.08 Lakh*
Have any question? Ask now!
Guaranteed response within 48 hours